| |
Introduction
Virtualization
consolidates resources to obliterate
waste in IT, and the associated cost
savings make this transformational
technology appropriate for businesses of
all sizes – small, medium and large.
This paper discusses the affordability,
reliability, scalability, and
recoverability of the virtual data
center relative to a traditional data
center with direct attached storage; and
it quantifies in detail the cost savings
of virtualization for the small
business. It also highlights several
additional benefits of implementing a
virtual data center with Cybernetics’
miSAN® D Series iSCSI SAN.
Affordability
With Cybernetics’ miSAN® D Series, terabytes of highly reliable RAID storage capacity can be allocated
across a variety of servers, operating systems, and databases. Full-featured yet surprisingly easy to manage,
miSAN® is live, block level storage that is fast, efficient, reliable – and affordable.
Consider a small company with six
servers. This example illustrated in the
chart below accounts for the servers
with associated hardware and software
for basic operations and traditional
backup. The obvious omission is the tape
backup hardware device itself, which is
common to both solutions and does not
impact the relative cost differences.
This six-server data center will cost
about $18,000:
This
data center has no redundancy and no
failover whatsoever. If any of the disk
drives or servers experiences a failure,
the entire department is down until the
problem can be resolved and the server
and data can be recovered. This is
complicated by the fact that traditional
servers are plagued with a classic
dissimilar hardware problem. If a
traditional server fails, recovery from
backup requires an identical hardware
server platform for a fast recovery..
With a dissimilar replacement hardware
server, the operating systems and
applications must be loaded from scratch
before any data recovery can even begin.
This applies to every board and chip in
the server, so the likelihood is very
low that an exact duplicate of any given
server will be available into the
future. Traditional server operating
systems are locked to the hardware,
making the recovery effort complicated
and time consuming.
In
a virtualized environment, a similar “six-server”
configuration will cost a little more at
$19,000:

An
important difference is that this
virtualized data center has more
powerful and reliable servers and
delivers complete redundancy and
failover. If one server fails, the
virtual servers will simply restart on
the other hardware server. Another
benefit is that virtual servers are
never dependent on a particular hardware
server platform. If server hardware
fails, any server can quickly be
installed to replace it. By contrast, in
the traditional data center with DAS
(direct attached storage), any single
server or single disk failure results in
downtime.
The
role of the iSCSI SAN storage is
critical in the virtual environment
because storage virtualization lends
fluidity to data accessibility. Just as
virtual servers are unfettered by
hardware, SAN storage is completely
removed from any server hardware
platform. When a virtual server fails
over, it transparently maintains the
data connection. With a Cybernetics
miSAN® iSCSI SAN, all
storage is virtualized and protected
with RAID + hot spare redundancy.
Because the Cybernetics miSAN®
D Series supports both SCSI and iSCSI
boot, so there is no need for direct
attached storage at all.
An
important source of cost reduction in
the virtual data center is in the backup
software. Cybernetics’ miSAN®
D Series iSCSI SAN backs itself up to
tape without a backup server or backup
software. Data is streamed directly from
the high-speed RAID array to the SCSI
attached tape drive. Because the backup
is handled at the hardware level by the
miSAN® D Series, it is a
serverless, background operation, and
the backup does not create any network
traffic. The backup streams over the
dedicated SCSI bus at the maximum
possible rate of the tape drive, which
is the optimal operating condition for
the tape drive and the media, improving
the reliability and longevity of tape
backup.
|
|